Tag Archives: Jim Broadbent

Cloud Atlas UK Premieres and Reviews; Healing Begins Filming; Hugo Weaving Interviews (Beijing, LA)

Note: this is an archived entry. Some links might not still work, but I have tried to ensure scan and video embeds are still in place. If any linked material is unavailable, please let me know and I’ll attempt to find a copy in my personal archives.

Hugo Weaving is probably hard at work on the set of Healing, his latest Australian film, which begins shooting in Victoria today. Alas, there are no images of him on set yet; Pointblank Pictures' latest updates include a copy of the film's press release and a note about the casting of actor Tony Briggs as another prison warden.  Many websites have passed along news of the project, including a heartening number of mainstream movie sites– we'll have to see how many actually cover or promote the film properly when it's actually released about this time in 2014. 😉 None of these internet reports includes any additional data, and most just repeat Pointblank's synopsis or director Craig Monahan's brief comments excerpted here last week. But they're worth a look for the different Hugo photos, I guess… FilmInk deserves praise for actually posting a recent one (see below). 😉 Anyhow, you can read these reports at Movies.ie, Marquee Management (Robert Taylor casting announcement), The Hollywood Reporter, JoBlo.com, Dark Horizons, Actucine (French), Braindamaged (French), Cine Maldito (Spanish), Primer Plano News (Spanish), Music News Australia, Dream Movie Cast, The Sydney Morning Herald, Snarkerati and Ain't It Cool News. The Chillin' With Geek Soul Brother podcast throws the project a mention 24 minutes in. (And if you're a genre geek, you'll want to give the whole thing a listen.)


Hugo Weaving, 2012, Cloud Atlas LA Press Conference Photo: Vera Andreson/WireImage

Cloud Atlas continued its gradual global roll-out with premieres at the Jameson's Dublin International Film Festival on February 16 and Glasgow International Film Festival on the 17th; there was also a London premiere earlier today. James D'Arcy covered promotional duties at the two festivals while Ben Whishaw, Jim Sturgess, Jim Broadbent and Hugh Grant joined him at the London event.


L to R: Hugh Grant, Jim Broadbent, James D'Arcy, Ben Whishaw, Jim Sturgess at the Cloud Atlas London premiere at The Curzon Mayfair, 18 February 2013.  Photo: David J Hogan/Getty Images.

For a selection of additional London premiere photos, go here; Jim Sturgess Online also has a nice batch.

Of course, Hugo couldn't be in two places at once, so he was unable to attend; the multiple premieres have given all of the cast members their chance to shine (or their turn at promotional chores, depending on how you want to look at it.) 😉 While Hugo's never been a fan of red carpet events per se, he's done more to promote Cloud Atlas than just about any other film he's done, attending premieres as far-flung as Toronto, Berlin, Moscow and Beijing. (He also did a few days of interviews in Los Angeles last fall, but skipped the official premiere there.)

Several UK and international papers and websites have run Hugo's promotional interviews with Susan Sarandon for Cloud Atlas; all were recorded last October in Los Angeles; some are re-edited versions of previously-seen material, but all are worth a look if you missed them the first time. The Huffington Post UK shared this video interview. [Note: Apparently, despite several format redesigns, LJ is still not very accommodating about embedding from non-YouTube sources. But go ahead and click here for a look.] Note: this isn't "exclusive" or even "new", but a re-edited version of the longer "Generic Interview" of Weaving and Sarandon posted to many sites last fall; that said, it's very entertaining and worth a look. Or another look. 😉

And TOM Magazine posted the complete transcript of Hugo Weaving and Susan Sarandon's AP Roundtable interview from last October in LA. I'll add the text under the cut:

Susan Sarandon and Hugo Weaving: Cloud Atlas

QUESTION:  When you look in the mirror and see yourself in all that make-up, do you ever recognize yourself?

SUSAN SARANDON:  The only time in my life, and I’ve had lots of prosthetics in my life, that I have not recognized myself was when I had the Indian man make-up on.  And I think it was because of the contacts, really.  Because even in Enchanted, when I had the hag makeup, which hopefully didn’t look too much like myself, I had my own eyes.  In this, I wore contacts, which was the first time I’ve ever surrendered to the contact thing.  And, in fact, there were two teams of contact supervisors who just put the contacts in and took them out, there were so many flying around.

QUESTION:  Were each of your segments done in complete, or were there ever times when you were overlapping with other segments?

SUSAN SARANDON:  Are you kidding.  Take it, Hugo.

HUGO WEAVING:  No, unless you had a character that was just sort of there for a couple of scenes, and you did that on the one day, that was the only time that happened.  But, with a continuing character, absolutely not.  I think I started and ended the film with the same character.

SUSAN SARANDON:  But, you had one week where you did five or six characters.

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah.  In one week sometimes you might be jumping from one to the other, from one day to the next.  But, in a funny way.  I mean, I’ve remarked on that, because I thought, ‘Oh, this is unusual.’  But, actually, when you’re doing it, on the day, you just focused on that one particular character and life and storyline.

SUSAN SARANDON:  It was more of a problem for the people who had to serve us up.  The scheduling and the makeup department was just moving.

HUGO WEAVING:  Imagine six totally different storylines, with all the actors playing in all of those stories, and then trying to schedule that.  It was an absolute nightmare and, of course, they said this schedule is set in stone; it can’t change.  And then Halle went and broke her ankle after two weeks and so the whole schedule changed quite regularly after that. But, it was pretty phenomenal the way they organized it.

QUESTION:  Did you use the multiple storylines as back stories to what you were playing, or were they all separate?

SUSAN SARANDON:  When you’re doing it, you’re not thinking outside of it, that metaphysical thing.  But, I think when you watch it, it’s quite clear that that’s what’s happening.  But, as Hugo said, you’re focusing completely on what you have to do that day and what that character knows and what that character wants.  It’s their job to leave it together.  Wouldn’t you say?

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah, absolutely, you just focused on one thing on the day.  You can’t think about all the other characters.  But, having said that bit, prior to shooting, there was a sense with my six characters that there was definitely a journey, if you like, and a link between them.  They all seemed to have a similar sort of thrust, if you like.

So, there’s definitely a link between all of them, and a lot of them serve a similar sort of functional purpose within each story.

QUESTION:  Was there ever a moment where you were playing two characters in the same scene?

HUGO WEAVING:  No.  The editing definitely does that.  So, you might leave one room and enter another as another character.  That’s certainly happened.  Or, there might be a line that you say that then obviously reverberates over something else that is pertinent to another one of your characters in another story.

SUSAN SARANDON:  And when they were assigning the characters to different actors, like Hugo’s all have one thrust.  And Tom starts out as this evil person and works his way through to redemption. Mine were all kind of spiritual, or more enlightened.

HUGO WEAVING:  So, in that way, the doing of it wasn’t radically different from day to day, because you’re just focusing on staying with it.

SUSAN SARANDON:  What was radically different was the ensemble spirit, the repertory spirit that you just don’t find in films, this kind of horizontal organization of power.  So, even the people that had big parts were playing little parts.  Everyone’s together in the trailer, and there’s this festive kind of Cirque du Soleil spirit.  Tattoos coming on and all the noses.

HUGO WEAVING:  It was very infectious.

SUSAN SARANDON:  And the bravery.  I got there mid-shoot and I was scared because I didn’t know what was happening.  And it was a different tone.  It was so festive and so brave and people just jumping from one thing to the next.  So all the egos were left outside and that’s very rare in a film.  You get it in theater, but you don’t have an opportunity, really, to experience that in a film.  That was such a gift, really.

HUGO WEAVING:  And when you have multiple characters, there’s less preciousness about one of them, because there are many. That’s kind of bright.

QUESTION:  Did you feel that even though you were playing such diverse characters that there was a through line and you were playing the soul of a person for over 500 years?

HUGO WEAVING:  I think intellectually I understood that that was certainly a theme and a concept.  And I certainly made a thread between all those souls, if you like, or that one soul.  But then, as we were saying, once that’s there, the experience of playing each one had to be separate.

They’re in their own lifetimes, not aware of their link to someone else, unless they were perhaps an enlightened character.

SUSAN SARANDON:  Who gets to say what the theme of the film is.

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah.

SUSAN SARANDON:  But, I think the audience is the one that makes the connection.

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah.

SUSAN SARANDON:  We had a special little screening in Chicago for the cast and some of the crew, and we could see it.  We were laughing at certain things.  But then we hit Toronto and having an audience made such a huge difference.  Hearing them laugh so hard and ooh and boo.  That was my opportunity to actually hear a lot of the phrases that are very subtly repeated.  And things that happen visually, I hadn’t caught a lot of it and I was glad that I saw it a second time, because I liked it even more, actually.

I appreciated their skill in dovetailing all the stories much more.  Because they could have just done them in blocks.  But this whole idea of a door closing, another one opening, literally, and watching how the music works and everything, I was able to appreciate a lot of it much more the second time.

QUESTION:  Do you have any personal feelings about the theme of the regeneration of the soul through different lifetimes and all of that?

HUGO WEAVING:  I wouldn’t necessarily believe in reincarnation, but I certainly believe that all the actions that you take in your life stem from a belief, even if that belief is not conscious, even if it’s an instinctive sort of belief.  And those actions have an effect on other people around you, of course.  And then, those actions have reverberations into the future and can change people’s lives in the future.  So, I certainly believe in that sense of the cyclical nature of human life.

SUSAN SARANDON:  And I feel that how you spend your energy is how you create yourself.  Every day you have to be awake and aware and understand the ramifications and the reverberations.  And, at the same time, the people come into your life and jobs come into your life and children come into your life, that seems somehow to take you in a new direction that you maybe were longing for, but didn’t expect.  So, what you have to do is be flexible and awake, because certainly my life and the serendipity in my life is far more imaginative than I could have been if I had a plan.

I’m actually here because all my plans failed, so I celebrate that in this film.  It excites me, the serendipity of life.  It excites me the adventure that you don’t know what’s coming, from where it is, that will be handed up.  That’s up to you, then, to use.  That’s where the free will comes into it.

But if you’ve lost someone and you see their body when they’re dead, it’s clear that they’re not there.  So, whatever that essence is, energy, who knows what happens to that or where that goes.  So, maybe not, as Hugo says, the packaging, but there is some fabulous mystery and the cause and effect that happens in your life that you’re not aware of even how you affect people.

QUESTION:  What were the challenges of working with three directors, Lana and Andy Wachowski and Tom Tykwer?

HUGO WEAVING:  In this instance, really, there was no challenge about working with Lana and Andy and Tom.  Lana and Andy are very sort of in-tune anyway.  And they had met Tom some time before they came up with this project, and they loved his films and admired him and met him, and they all got on so well they kept wanting to see each other.  And then they decided that they should probably one day do a film together, whatever that might be.

And then it was over another period of time talking about what that project would be.  Cloud Atlas came up and they read that and talked about that and got excited about that.  So, once the script had been written and they’d worked on that together and finally managed to raise all the money, they got the team together.

I’d worked with Lana and Andy before, but when I met Tom, I was on Skype and he sort of bounded into this frame and Lana and Andy were there and Tom bounded into the background.  The three of them are going, ‘Hi, Hugo,’  And I thought, these three are so in-tune and so well suited to being together.  And that was after a lengthy pre-production period.

They just seem to be extraordinarily, all incredibly well-prepared, highly intelligent, very open to each other, and great lovers of actors and film.  And they share very similar ideas about life.  So, it was really not a challenge working with any of them at all.

QUESTION:  What was it like working with their different directing styles?

HUGO WEAVING:  As an actor, you work with different directors all the time, and we were never on the same set.  There was only one day that I saw them on the same set, because Tom had a shutdown period for one day.  But they never had to direct altogether anyway.  They sorted it beforehand.

SUSAN SARANDON:  They wrote it together.  So, they were literally on the same page and they spent that time, I think, battling everything out ahead of time, and trying to understand exactly how to make that happen.  And they delight in each other.

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah, they do.

SUSAN SARANDON:  And, actually, they celebrate each other.  There’s no sense of competition.  It’s really fantastic.

HUGO WEAVING:  It’s very joyous seeing them all together.  It’s great.  What I find remarkable is that they not only manage to make this one, but then, all were all together in the editing process.  Now, that’s more interesting.

I mean, I have talked to them about it and they said, ‘Look, to be honest, it was difficult and we had to lose some of the things we loved most,’ but I think they said they had maybe one day where it was problematic and they had to think.  But, it wasn’t to do with a clash of personalities; it was just a difficult decision that they had to make.  They’re very well suited to each other.  And they’re very giving, generous people.  But they’re no dummies.

SUSAN SARANDON:  And Tom did the music.  So, that contribution wouldn’t have been there if he hadn’t been there.

And the Wachowskis are in such an interesting place right now, and the difference between how things were directed during Speed Racer, which was a completely different kind of cartoon, very exacting kind of thing, I think that this was much looser and much more funny than that.

QUESTION:  The Wachowskis seem to have become more open to press with this film.  Do you have the sense that they’ve changed over the years that you’ve known them?

HUGO WEAVING:  I have always found them wonderfully easy and joyous to be with.  From the moment I met them, we clicked and have laughed from that day on.  So, they’re very warm, smart, lovely people.

They’re just very shy and very protective of their privacy.  Some people find it very hard to be in this situation.  Talking to a vast audience or to a small group can be difficult.

SUSAN SARANDON:  Also, I think that what happens in this film subliminally, with the actors playing many different parts and with the stories being edited in a certain way and everything else, is that even though they don’t talk about it in the movie, subliminally what happens is this fluidity of gender and race and age and period.  Part of what happens is that you understand that this is everyone, no matter what the wrapping is, that that spirit of that person, the humanity, is what we all have in common.

I think it’s a gift to journalists that now is the time when they’re doing this, that they have something that is even bigger that has encouraged them to step out.  I mean, you’d have to talk to them about it, but it’s a very different kind of film with what they’ve asked the actors to do and what they’ve done, and the collaboration.  I think it’s just a very special moment in time where the work and the artists, they’re in a different place, and it’s a very brave thing for them to do it.

HUGO WEAVING:  Lots of changes have gone on.  But, fundamentally, these two people are of very much the same spirits that I first met the first day I met them years ago.  And they’re truly wonderful.

* * *

Note: If you missed the delectable audio version of this interview last fall, you can grab a copy here through February 25. Thanks again to Liz at Jim Sturgess Online for making this available. 🙂

… And here's a hitherto unseen photo from the 8 September 2012 premiere of Cloud Atlas in Toronto:


Hugo Weaving and Katrina Greenwood at TIFF   Photo: Tyler Ledger via Facebook

New Cloud Atlas reviews continue to appear worldwide; the latest positive (or mixed but well-written) ones can be read at South China Morning Post, Kitten of Discord, IZ Reloaded, The Daily Record, The Sun Daily, The Wild Bore, The Hollywood News, The Upcoming, Hayes At The Movies, Box Office Buzz and Failed Critics. There's also an interesting article about Lana Wachowski, the film's depiction of fluid identities, and how this is challenging the media (and hopefully, those so stuck in old political-correctness tropes that they misconstrue the film's makeup and intentions) at F News Magazine.

In other Hugo Weaving News, Sydney Theatre Company's box office began selling single tickets for Beckett's Waiting For Godot, which will reteam Hugo with Richard Roxburgh, on February 11. Sydney Morning Herald reported the next day that STC's website and phonelines promtly crashed due to demand, prompting apologies on Twitter. According to STC's website, tickets for Godot (and The Maids, costarring Cate Blanchett and Isabel Huppert, another mega-draw) remain available, but if you want to go and haven't bought tickets yet, ACT FAST. 😉 Tickets will probably be sold on eBay and via various ticket-brokers at extortionate prices… and STC often hold blocks of tickets to select shows back to make available closer to a play's engagement. The play runs November 12-December 14 this year; the play's webpage can direct you to best ticket availability; several nights are already sold out. No word yet on international tours, but with demand like this, you gotta have hope. (A rival production of Godot starring Sir Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart will play on Broadway later this year.) The Irish Echo also reported on the booming ticket sales for this production, so there is worldwide interest.

Finally, thanks to Elisa at Random Scribblings for uploading Hugo's recent Chinese media interviews to YouTube so I can finally embed them here. I'll include links back to the original pages as well:


from Ent.163.com


from TV.Sohu.com


from v.qq.com (interview with Hugo, The Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer)


from Sina.com.cn


from ent.ifeng.com


compilation of m.1905.com videos of the premiere

All are well worth a look if you didn't check them out when I posted the links around the time of the Beijing premiere; Hugo gave some of his most in-depth videos in recent memory to Sina, iFeng and particularly Ent.163.

I hope we'll have some news or photos from the Healing set soon!   

Advertisements

Hobbit Promotion Begins in Earnest, Cloud Atlas Pics & Articles, The Turning Details

Note: this is an archived entry. Some links might not still work, but I have tried to ensure scan and video embeds are still in place. If any linked material is unavailable, please let me know and I’ll attempt to find a copy in my personal archives.

Apologies for the lack of updates recently… my work schedule has been unforgiving. There are major updates on three Hugo Weaving projects to report, though, so I'll get right to that without further ado.

First there's breaking news on Hugo's participation in the Australian anthology film The Turning, based on the Tim Winton book of linked stories. An in-depth interview with one of the film's distributors, Tine Klint of LevelK Films, at SBS. According to the article, Hugo will star in a segment entitled "The Commission", to be directed by his old friend (and frequent costar) David Wenham. Cate Blanchett will direct and costar in a different segment, "Reunion", and Miranda Otto and Rose Byrne will costar in "The Turning" (yes, the same title as the film). If I had read the book, as I'm sorely tempted to, I could probably tell you more about role specifics and whether/how various stories are linked, but it's probably best for now that I avoid spoiler territory. According to Klint, there are "plans to launch the film at a major international festival, probably Toronto or Venice in late 2013"…"We have a lot of international distributors that are following the film and had some offers at the American Film Market that we are working on now,” she says. Given how dicey and delayed international distribution can be with Australian films, it's very encouraging to hear this one already has an international distributor in place, though at this point rights to the European and American markets aren't sold. The film will debut at the Melbourne International Film Festival next July; it's unknown whether Hugo has filmed his sequence; I would guess not given how busy he's been. But it's great to have specifics about when the film will be seen this far in advance, and the presence of so many internationally-known actors can only help its chances.

Next, here's the latest batch of photos of Hugo at the Berlin premiere of Cloud Atlas on November 5 (plus a handful from Moscow); some are enlargements or "cleaned up" versions of images previously shared, some are new. As always, if anyone has clean or high-res versions of any images with watermarks, we'd love to see them.


Michael Sohn/AP


Laurenz Carpen/Red Carpet Reports


XVerleih/via James D'Arcy Fans Pinterest (Thanks!)


(Both) Dave Bedrosian/Corbis

Many more under the cut!

First 14 photos: Melanie Renker/Retna:

Next 9:  Dave Bedrosian/Corbis


Tom Tykwer, Marie Steinmann, Hugo Weaving

Next  :Laurenz Carpen/Red Carpet Reports


L to R: Andy Wachowski, Gotz Otto, James D'Arcy, Tom Hanks, Lana Wachowski in front of Halle Berry, Tom Tykwer, Bae Doona, Hugo Weaving in front of Ben Whishaw


Hugo Weaving, Tom Tykwer, Marie Steinmann


Andreas Rentz/Getty


Newsday

Next 4: Britta Pedersen/Corbis


Manrizio Gambarini/Corbis


Ciao Hollywood/Corbis


Splash News

Here are some pics from the Moscow premiere:


Next 3 photos: Woman.ru   Bae Doona, Hugo Weaving, Halle Berry


Next 3: Sharifulin Valley/ Corbis

Here are way too many screencaps from the November 2 press conference:

The website Dizifilm posted a treasure trove of high-res stills and behind the scenes images from the film; Hugo content under the cut:


Lest anyone think their recent dinner conversations have been awkward… 😉


The guy to the right of Hugo is author David Mitchell. So those identity politics morons who think Mitchell is on their side need to stop making that claim NOW. Oh, and actually see the film before you slander it any further.

Note; These are not nearly as large as the originals here. (Curse LJ and Photobucke size restrictions!)

There are several worthwhile new articles on Cloud Atlas at the following websites: there's a Tom Tykwer interview at Zeit Online, an interview with all three directors at Der Tagesspiegel, an audio interview with the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer at The Nerdist Podcast, a brief new thematic/making of featurette (no embedding. alas) at Entertainment Weekly,  an interview with and article about actress Zhou Xun's makeup transformations at EW, a brief excerpt from a Halle Berry/Tom Tykwer interview (which appeared in print only) at The Sun, an admonishment to homophobic twerps who have issues with the Frobisher/Sixsmith romance plot at The Advocate, and an interview with the film's makeup artists Daniel Parker and Jeremy Woodhead at The Los Angeles Times ( Parker: "My first big transformation was on Hugo Weaving, turning him into Nurse Noakes. And the thing that makes changing a man into a woman so challenging is, particularly in this case, you've got Hugo, who's a very masculine man. And so it was a question of changing the bone structure, raising eyebrows and softening the forehead. Also, what I wanted to do was change the whole skin quality, because female skin is so much softer and peach-like."; also the amusing fact that Susan Sarandon's Indian professor was created at the last minute on set, so Susan Sarandon actually had to borrow prosthetics made for Jim Strugess and James D'Arcy.) 😉   

Also, there's heartening news from Russia: the film had a $9.1 million opening there, which, to put things in perspective, is better than the opening grosses for Skyfall and The Dark Knight Rises. More details available at The Hollywood Reporter and Screen Daily… I hope the rest of Europe also treats the film better than jaded, pablum-craving US audiences did.

Warner Bros has launched a long-shot Oscar campaign for the film, including Best Supporting Actor nod suggestions for (take a deep breath): Hugo Weaving, Jim Sturgess, James D'Arcy, Keith David, Hugh Grant, Ben Whishaw, Jim Broadbent and David Gyasi. (Whew!) IMO, Sturgess, Broadbent and possibly Whishaw are lead actors, and all delivered stronger work than Warner's sole Lead Actor pick Tom Hanks. If the Oscars were remotely fair, Broadbent would have a strong chance in the lead category and D'Arcy in supporting, but I doubt the academy will nominate any actor from the film except possibly Halle Berry, because the Lead Actress field tends to be weak in American movies. As for Hugo, he'd never campaign personally for a Oscar (which is sort of required if you want to win), and his roles in the film are limited, though he did the best he could with what he had to work with. I hope one day one of his Australian films breaks through over here in a big way, because his best work as an actor is inarguably in films like Little Fish, Last Ride and Oranges and Sunshine. I personally think the film's only real chances for nominations are in score (which it should win easily), makeup, editing and possibly adapted screenplay… and even these are iffy given how risk-averse academy voters tend to be. But it's good of Warner's to try, particularly after they bungled US distribution somewhat.  You can read the full list of Warner's nomination possibilities at IndieWire.    

There are new positive (or mixed but well-written) reviews of Cloud Atlas at Sam Shot First, Gayot.com, Grimes & Rowe Watch A Movie, Danny Baram, Club Parnassus, The Password is Swordfish, Alderaan Places, The Republika, The AP Book Club, Les Fleurs de Maraschine, Kitty Lambda, Movies & Such With Clayton, My Entertainment World, Pierced To The Heart, Lake Forest CA Patch, Chronicle; The Conversation, QuadNews.net, Cinema Sight, Jerome Shaw, Washburn Review Online, Double Exposure, Love and Squalor, San Diego Entertainer, and Benefits of a Classical Education.

…And there's another positive review of the US DVD release of Last Ride at Movies You Missed. Which is appreciated even by those of us who managed to see it in theaters. 😉

Finally, we're starting to see a lot more advance promo material for The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey as we come within a month of its release date. I'll embed all five TV Spots that have appeared so far (beneath a cut) and add all Elrond-centric photos: fans of LOTR/The Hobbit in general should check these links and TORn (The One Ring.net) for (much) more: IMDb, and HeyUGuys (new stills), MovieWeb  and Rope of Silicon (new character banners), Anime Movie Forever (lots of behind the stills pics and character portraits– especially of Richard Armitage), TolkienBrasil.com (60 new behind the scenes pics), ComicBookMovie (150 new images, though their slideshow isn't currently working), Empire Online (to hear the full soundtrack), Ian McKellen's blog (for insider details… and because Ian McKellen is cool–duh!) 😉 , Stuff.co.nz (Martin Freeman interview and a behind the scenes report— alas, Hugo wasn't on set at the time– but the site has a plethora of new pics) and Comingsoon.net (to hear Neill Finn's song "The Lonely Mountain" which the Dwarves sing in the film's trailer.)  

Notable New Pics:


Ian McKellen and Hugo Weaving on the set


Elrond character banner (larger version here)


Richard Armitage and Ian McKellen (yes, in fact, Wizards do make accommodations for the weather) 😉


Elrond, Gandalf and Galadriel in Rivendell


Gandalf and Galadriel


Hugo Weaving, Peter Jackson and Ian McKellen on the set


Sylvester McCoy (Radagast) and Peter Jackson


Martin Freeman ("How many more months to we have to go?" 😉 )


Again, Wizards do make accommodations for the weather 😉

This is just a drop in the bucket of what's out there (though it's all of the new Elrond content… so far). Do check out all the other sites if you want to explore further!

Here are the five extant TV Spots… and a couple of bonuses. 😉

And here's a preview images from the 2013 Hobbit Calendar (German version… not certain if the US version will be the same .)


You can preview the whole thing (and order this version, if you like) here. You can order the US version (which is completely different– I checked) here. Elrond has one month in each…


(US Hobbit Calendar, November image)

Finally, one more Cloud Atlas cast interview compilation… this one has very little about the film (and Hugo gets a very thankless question) but it's entertaining:

Hope you guys voted… 😉

Cloud Atlas Berlin Premiere: New Photos and Video, Hugo Weaving Interviews

Note: this is an archived entry. Some links might not still work, but I have tried to ensure scan and video embeds are still in place. If any linked material is unavailable, please let me know and I’ll attempt to find a copy in my personal archives.

Had to take a break yesterday and most of today to attend to certain constitutional obligations 😉 and the usual work and chores… you may have heard the northeast was hit with another storm today (siiiiiigh). Fortunately we never lost power this time, though driving might be a bit hairy…. I did manage to sneak off yesterday evening for a Cloud Atlas IMAX screening after casting my ballot. I’m happy to report the film still holds much fascination, and grows more compelling as a piece of art rather than a thing to be broken down and analyzed. I’d heard mixed reports on the IMAX version (all from people who generally loved the film) but I thought it was, indeed, an enhancement, allowing the viewer to notice even more incidental detail. The surround-sound heightens the visceral impact of both the film’s musical theme (which is intricately intertwined with the editing and storytelling) as well as the action sequences. I felt like Jim Sturgess might have winged me a time of two with that laser gun. 😉  As was unfortunately the case at the midnight screening I attended on Oct 26, the crowd was sparse, but with a lot of “repeat offenders” like myself. (As one fellow patron walked in, he saw I was the only person there at that point, and said “Thought you were gonna have a private screening, didn’t you? You’re gonna love this movie!” Hated to break it to him that I’d already seen it twice.) 😉

Every element of the production design is deliberate and witty/insightful. I also finally spotted Ben Whishaw in the hut scene. 😉 (He’s the “fusion engines” guy.) Other minutiae people have asked about: Susan Saradon’s dog appears very fleetingly in the scene where Cavendish stops by Ursula (his old flame)’s house. She’s NOT the dog that pisses off Bill Smoke at the worst possible time. (For the record, I still can’t understand 90% of what Bae Doona says in that scene when she’s supposed to be speaking in English. Apart from the lame comeback line. Also, what sweatshop lets workers keep pets? and if she’s running the sweatshop, why should I feel any sympathy for her? Isn’t she just exploiting her own people? Yes, I know I’m biased, but the film’s treatment of Hugo’s characters remains a major sticking point with me.)

Other details: the Nurse James character that the James D’Arcy fans keep trying to spot is only in one scene, the scene where Cavendish first approaches Mrs Judd (the woman who admitted him to Aurora House) insisting he be given his keys back. He’s wearing aqua-colored scrubs and leaning over a table where some of the residents are seated. It’s a momentary reaction shot as Cavendish sputters the line about criminal abuse that will later become immortal. 😉 David Mitchell (the author) appears twice in the Sonmi sequence, playing a Unanimity spy/infiltrator of the Union Army. He’s seen passing Sonmi and Hae-Joo on a flight of stairs when they’re going to see Ankor Apis for the first time. Later, he’s standing to Boardman Mephi’s right when Sonmi is executed. Apparently it’s Mitchell’s little in-joke about being his character’s creator and destroyer.  There are multiple references to Carlos Castaneda… the first and most obvious is in the scene where Luisa Rey interviews Isaac Sachs, but we later see one of his books on Georgette Cavendish’s bedside table (Denholme, meanwhile, has Margaret Thatcher’s memoirs as his bedtime reading.) 😉 There’s also a reference during Sonmi’s education period while she’s in hiding with Hae-Joo. The film is literally chock full of these little bonus details… I’m sure even after three viewings I’ve missed some. I’m equally sure that a lot of these things will be lost or minimized on a TV screen unless you’re wealthy enough to have an 80″ plasma HD set-up. So again, if you’re curious about this film, please see it in a cinema at least once! Cloud Atlas is still playing in many US cities and quietly continuing to open on new screens despite the quiet first weekend boxoffice.

Also, wanted to apologize for the disorganized state of and errors in some previous posts. I often have only a few hours free and have to throw as much up here as I can. In some cases I can’t access HTML because my computer freezes or slows, so I’m forced to post imperfect entries and try to correct or organize them later if my computer/local cable provider decide to cooperate. I have tried to eliminate obvious typos, mistakes, etc and put some of the previous entry’s photos behind a cut.

But on to the new material! First, we have several new red carpet videos from Berlin:

Brief clip with extremely shaky hand-held footage of group photos:

Much more professional footage of the red carpet/autographs:

The only English-language version of a clip that was featured on many German entertainment sites. Not much interview footage, but Hugo is glimpsed in the group shot:

Also minimal Hugo content in this clip from Film Insider (written coverage here), but it’s a good overview of the event

This one’s my favorite non-interview clip so far; great use of music. These poor actors must have carpal tunnel by this point, though. 😉

Hugo discusses working in Berlin in this interview from Julie the Movie Girl (and gets props from his costar Gotz Otto, who played Withers to his Nurse Noakes). Also: Tom Hanks, Halle Berry

Hugo is also interviewed by MoviePilot in this clip; he discusses how he’s successfully avoided working in Hollywood, and which of the Cloud Atlas time periods he’d most want to live in. (Also interviewed: Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Tom Tykwer and Gotz Otto)

The Polish entertainment website WP.PL Movie has an interview with Hugo (and footage of costar James D’Arcy being a smartass… to be fair, D’Arcy’s tried to inject humor into all of his interviews to avoid a sameness… you can tell how tired a lot of the actors are by this point.) For fans who don’t know much about Hugo beyond a few villain roles, though… he would never behave that way on set. (Just ask Gotz Otto. Maybe Hugo should’ve sicced him on James) 😉  You can watch more ZDF footage of the premiere here (minimal Hugo content.) AFP has a similar overview, with overdubbed comments from Hanks and Berry.

There are two more German making-of videos (technically I posted #2 in the previous entry, these are #1 and #3. Hugo is interviewed briefly, and there’s lots of great behind the scenes footage not seen in all of the American BTS clips:

Here are some new photos of the Berlin premiere:


Hugo Weaving, solo and with costar Martin Wuttke. Both: WireImage


John Detinger via Twitter


OK Magazine


WP.PL Movie
L to R: Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Tom Tykwer, Lana Wachowski, Bae Doona. Ben Whishaw, Hugo Weaving, Martin Wuttke


Same, full-length view


Michael Sohn/Associated Press


Filmkritiker.com: the cast, director, producers


Andreas Rentz/Getty Images (larger version)


Above two photos: Kurt Krieger/X-Rental
L to R: Andy Wachowski, Gotz Otto, James D’Arcy, Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Tom Tyker, Lana Wachowski, Bae Doona, Ben Whishaw, Hugo Weaving, Martin Wuttke

Note: Apologies for the watermarks on these; I found them impossible to remove, but thought the images still worth sharing because several are unique. (I might have a go at some of the less-saturated ones with a cloning pencil when I have more free time..)


First three photos: Petra Preuss/Rex Features via Sipa.com


Tom Tykwer, Marie Steinmann, Hugo Weaving

The next 25 photos(!) are from Zuma via Tipsimages.it. The first ten are by Dave Bedrosian, the next nine by Tom Jaeger, the next two by Klaus Werner and and the final by Frederic:

If anyone out there has an account with these photo sites… we’d love to see these as they were meant to be seen. 😉


Michael Sohn/AP

Some great photos of red carpet autograph signing from Am Ende Des Tages/Star Press:


Andy Wachowski gets creative signing autographs 😉


Promiflash

Next three photos: WENN via Spokeo:

Assorted other Cloud Atlas articles: there’s some beautiful concept art by Adam Kuczek at ak.art.net. There’s an intriguing look at the film’s innovative take on gender politics at Woman and Hollywood/IndieWire, and Han Cinema assures us that the real Seoul is not likely to go the way of Neo Seoul in the film. Der Tasspiegel quotes several of the film’s stars about working in Berlin. Here’s what Hugo had to say: “Hugo Weaving (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings), who lived in Berlin during the shoot, [said] that the city was ‘incredibly civilized, non-aggressive, tolerant and rich in culture, history and good food’.”

There are so many positive reviews I’ve lost count, but here’s a sampling: Cinema Coma, Luckshotpromovies, Press Pass LA, University News, Singularity Weblog, Empower Network, The Movie Watch, The Spartan Chronicle, Isolated Press, Cut The Crap Movie Reviews, Hard In The City, Shiny Potato, Heritage.com, 15th St News, Salman Latif, 031 Cinephile, Daily Gawk, and The Knights.

Cloud Atlas Post-Release Review Roundup Part 3

Note: this is an archived entry. Some links might not still work, but I have tried to ensure scan and video embeds are still in place. If any linked material is unavailable, please let me know and I’ll attempt to find a copy in my personal archives.

Yes… far too many new reviews, all of them positive or leaning-positive. Point being, don’t let the cynics or dopes talk you out of seeing this film! Once again, I will try to embellish these text posts will photos when I have more time.

Darren Goodheart, Backseat Producers: “Every now and then, we sorta need this type of film just to remind ourselves that we’re all part of a bigger picture….It’s definitely an ambitious production, and some might even think pretentious. I don’t necessarily mind a little pretension if the heart and drive is there, and it’s definitely there throughout every aspect of the film. Though it’s two separate directing units, so to speak, it’s pretty seamless in it’s presentation. Cloud Atlas runs nearly three hours long but thanks to some extremely skillful editing it moves at a breakneck pace, though it still gives you the chance to soak it all in. The production values are high and quite beautiful and equally complimented by an emotional score from Tykwer working with Reinhold Heil and Johnny Klimek… The greatest thing that Cloud Atlas has going for it besides it’s directorial vision is an absolutely amazing ensemble cast that literally plays parts in every single story told through the film… I was particularly impressed with Broadbent, Weaving, Sturgess, Bae and Grant- really enjoying seeing Grant play so against type in almost all of the sequences. It really is a cast to die for and they’re all committed to seeing the directors’ vision shine through… Cloud Atlas is indeed a sprawling epic in the truest sense. It’s message may be obvious, but there’s nothing wrong with that when it’s presented with this amount of heart and conviction, and underscored through a truly lavish production. Cloud Atlas is a movie that demands to be seen on a big screen to truly appreciate it’s scope. It’s a meaty and lengthy piece, but it moves at an extremely brisk pace and by it’s end.”

Joe Tyrell, New Jersey Newsroom: “[David] Mitchell wove connections among past, present and future. Only a miniseries, or a week of a shaman’s tales around the campfire, might fully capture their breadth and nuance…And yet, this epic, nearly three hours long, comes close. With their directorial work divided and movie stars taking multiple turns, the Wachowskis and Tykwer manage a decent depiction of Mitchell’s themes of the struggles of freedom against acquiescence and truth against greed… But what carries the Sonmi sections of “Cloud Atlas” are not the overbearing special effects but the intellectual fencing between Bae and D’Arcy as the “archivist” who is interrogating her to create a record for the Unanimity, the corpocracy that runs her world…Yes, “Cloud Atlas” crams in gunfire and explosions, but it also makes room for the quiet march of ideas. At once ridiculous and sublime, “Cloud Atlas” is the most movie you can get for your entertainment dollar.”

[CJ– Tyrell’s condescending comments about Hugo Weaving won’t be reprinted here– suffice to say they’re both shallow and factually incorrect. Weaving has plenty of female admirers and has played a variety of protagonists– just not in Hollywood fare. But Hollywood fare rarely offers complex characters, just good and evil flavors of cardboard.]

Rohan, Masters of Cinema: “Besides the film’s sheer beauty, breathtaking special effects, score, performances, costumes, locations, cinematography and its essential message, it is, in my opinion, will be still an arduous process for some to sit and view as films like Cloud Atlas goes far more deeper than just a story. This is the definition of age, time and how man from the beginning of time lived, experienced life in the universe; it rejects the existence of heaven and hell. Therefore, it demands its own audience. We, at times, sit and claim that the contemporary cinema lacks aspiration, desire, originality and imagination, for we at times, forget that cinema still lives in the hearts of artists…  Cloud Atlas is a wise film, for it is wisely written and directed. Challenging from its opening scene, indeed and I can tell you that it is going to take that mind of yours and test its tolerance. For some the length of this gorgeous, enthralling and epic film might be a process of enduring tedium, while for some, and I am sure about this, Cloud Atlas is entertaining and fun. Not even one minute or second of this ambitious film bored me. It is about working out the logical connections between the six stories, the characters in them, and their goals. Cloud Atlas is not only, in my opinion, important for its message or its mind-blowing special effects, performances and directing, it is because films like Cloud Atlas scares the daylights out of studios. .. It is a work of wonder as here, we are talking about, not only film-making and writing at its best, we are talking about the make-up, score, effects, locations, costumes, attention to detail. It is cinema, in my opinion, at its best.”

Richard Kniht Jr., Windy City Times: “As you are entertained by the different vignettes—the breathtaking visuals (thanks to the cinematography of Frank Grieve and John Toll), drink in Tykwer’s gorgeous music (composed in advance of shooting with his collaborators Reinhold Heil and Johnny Klimek) and revel in the endless human parade displayed by Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Hugh Grant, Susan Sarandon, Hugo Weaving, et al., having a grand time with their myriad characters, accents and ‘looks’—the business of trying to sort out what you’re watching dissipates because the movie is so damn entertaining….During the gestation of the project Larry Wachowski transitioned to female (becoming Lana) and, whether it’s a coincidence or not, the connecting device in the film, based on the 2004 sci-fi themed novel by David Mitchell (which Lana and brother Andy and Tykwer adapted), are the secret love letters of two gay lovers in 1936 (played by Ben Whishaw and James D’Arcy). Across the sands of time, single acts of kindness ripple and resonate but these heartbreaking, deeply emotional letters—talismans that appear and disappear at just the right moment—anchor the narrative and drive home the point that repression of minorities through the ages (sexual, ethnic, etc.) have lasting consequences on humanity as a whole.”

Fergusontx, Movie-Blogger: “Hopefully, you have not come here for answers to the many mysteries offered up by this most unique film experience. If you are the type that loves to think, analyze and discuss complex movies, you will be challenged and satisfied. If you prefer your stories clean, straightforward and gift-wrapped, you will be like some of those in my audience who walked out of the theatre at various stages -not to return… Many will describe the film as messy or convoluted, but the argument can be made that those traits add to the fun. Certainly, this won’t be to the taste of most; however, if you thrive on life’s puzzles, the film will hit your sweet spot… Especially entertaining are Hugo Weaving as a sadistic female nurse and Hugh Grant as a violent tribesman. The best laughs in the film are courtesy of the great Mr. Broadbent whose facial expressions are near clown-like in elasticity.

… You may disagree but our debates will be colorful … and may change after a second viewing!”

Omer M. Mozzaffar, Chicago Sun-Times Blog: “”Cloud Atlas” (2012), directed by the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer, is a thing of beauty, the likes of which I have not seen in American Cinema. ..[T]his film might be the best film of the decade. Nevertheless, considering how many people walked out of the screening within the first hour, I suspect that this film will successfully alienate or confuse most of its viewers, earning more appreciation in the years to come, long after most of us have expired. If you have the patience, it might take forty minutes to begin to understand it, and to subsequently immerse yourself into it… There is the overall question in the film of destiny: are we able to choose our actions, and if so, what effects do they have on the rest of the world? According to the film, the greatest choice is the choice to be the person you are. This film adds a series of censors compelling our characters into some sort of social conformity. Almost all of these censors are played by Hugo Weaving. At times, he is a greedy opportunist with giant sideburns. At times, he is a corporate hitman in a trenchcoat. At times, he is the Devil in a top hat. At times, he is a ruthless warden in the body of a frowning nurse… Fourth, continuing this point, the plot(s) would be far more coherent if the same (mostly big name) actors and actresses (primarily Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Susan Sarandon, Jim Broadbent, Hugh Grant, Keith David, and Weaving) were not re-used for almost every thread. For much of the film, this makes for a very distracting process… But, there is a method here in having the same actors and actresses play multiple characters. [L]iberation is a liberation from all boundaries.. In “Cloud Atlas,” however, the point is that true humanity is not bound by anything, that your true self is locked in a series of cages. The first cage is your gender. The second cage is your set of personal demons. The third cage is the warden (that might be disguised as a beloved). The fourth cage is society, with its institutionalized restrictions (often on appropriate and forbidden relationships). The fifth cage is time, whether we speak of the pervasive presence of each soul through the six centuries, or our need to watch this story in chronological order. And, the sixth cage of life is life itself; characters free themselves from the constraints of life in each of the ways you would imagine.” [This is a lengthy, complex metaphysical essay… if this excerpt intrigues you, do go read the rest.]

John Fleury, Examiner.com: “This is an engaging piece of filmmaking, and while some may be apprehensive of its running time of nearly 3 hours, they will find that the film spends all that time wisely… Each of these stories carry unique visual and thematic styles, tackling historical issues such as racism, still-relevent issues such as homosexuality, and the horrific possibilities of dystopian futures. What does carry over to each story is the actors used. You’ll spot the likes of Hanks, Berry, Broadbent, and others such as Keith David and Hugo Weaving multiple times as entirely different characters – some even with different ethnicities or genders… This will probably be distracting for some, but for me, it helped to gel the segments better together so that it didn’t feel like I was watching six completely unrelated movies. Certain characters do also carry over across segments, such as James D’Arcy appearing as the same character in both the 1930s and 1970s stories. Despite the unique traits each story has, I never felt like I was being jarred abruptly from one to the next as the focus continued to shift every 2 to 3 minutes… Each story is well done to a level that all six of them could theoretically be their own movie if the writers were willing to flesh them out to a longer length… Cloud Atlas is easily one of the years’ most ambitious films, and I think it’s a gamble that pays off. Other reviews have been very mixed, and I can’t fault either side for feeling the way they do. In some ways, I think the movie is surprisingly accessible, while other aspects I feel will not be for everyone. Speaking for myself, I enjoyed it, and I have a feeling that it it could grow to have a large following as more people discover it over the years. If you are curious to see just what this movie is all about, I recommend you find out and come to your own conclusions. The film certainly seems to be made with that idea in mind.”Rene Rodriguez, Miami Herald: “The Wachowskis create a gleaming, meticulously rendered future-world where every tiny detail fascinates, from the colors of a restaurant menu to the design of police spacecraft, and where the thunderous action is staged in the style of old-fashioned cliffhangers, with narrow escapes and relentless chases…Tykwer opts for a slower, gentler pace, using the piece of music his character composes, entitled The Cloud Atlas Sextet, as a theme that recurs through the movie’s score, and ending his story with the single most moving moment in the film — the only time, really, when this enormous movie achieves any emotional intimacy and touches the heart… Editor Alexander Berner has been tasked with the daunting task of intertwining all these disparate storylines, looking for natural overlaps and recurring themes to connect the tales into a single, enormous tapestry. He doesn’t succeed. As a whole, Cloud Atlas doesn’t hang together.. And yet: Even at nearly three hours, Cloud Atlas never sags, because the film doesn’t spend enough time on the bad stories to derail the good ones (it’s like surfing through six different TV channels). And as distracting as the makeup jobs can be, the stunt of casting famous actors in various roles sometimes pays off. Hanks is terrific in the 1846 tale as a doctor pretending to tend to a sick man while he’s actually poisoning him, and he’s even better in a brief appearance in the London story as a thuggish author who exacts radical revenge on a critic who panned his book. Berry’s best work is her turn as the investigative reporter who may be nosing into dangerous corners, and she even pulls off the small role of a white Jewish woman in the 1936 strand (the makeup work is so effective, she’s almost unrecognizable)… Cloud Atlas is more of a spin-off on the original text — a kind of bonus supplement — than a true adaptation. The film departs so radically from Mitchell, it stands alone as its own thing. Visually, the movie is beautiful…  onsidering the density and breadth of the movie, the potential for confusion was great. But Cloud Atlas is clear and easy to follow, and the constant intercutting and juxtaposing create a kind of momentum that serves as a sort of unique hyper-narrative. I wish the filmmakers had come up with better ways other than shared birthmarks and handed-down letters to tie the whole picture together. But if you’re interested in the sheer craft of moviemaking, Cloud Atlas is required viewing – a rare example of a movie getting by entirely on technique and creative bravado.”Mike Wilmington, Movie City News: “I loved it. And for once, I’m speechless… Mitchell arranged his novel in six parts, advancing chronologically, and those parts  kept breaking off in the middle to bring in part of the last chapter. Then he finished up with the resolution of all six stories, this time in reverse (or mirror) order. It’s a tricky structure, maybe not as tricky as Vladimir Nabokov’s Pale Fire, with its tell-tale footnotes.  So, to lessen the confusion, I suggest you google and read a long synopsis before seeing it.  It would be best to read the novel first, of course, but I realize that’s not an option for lots of us.  Later, maybe… [T]he actors take multiple roles, and that’s not a stunt. The galleries of roles reinforce Mitchell’s theme of reincarnation and of souls traveling from body to body. The movie, meanwhile, has many forms itslef. It’s full of romance and mystery and action and spectacle and humor.. So…You must see it. For yourself. Even if you despise it, you’ll have fun vivisecting it afterwards. It’s 164 minutes long, and, as Roger Ebert has said, there’s not a boring second in it. Befuddling  maybe. Boring no.”

James Berardinelli, Reelviews: “They key to successfully absorbing the movie may be in not trying to overthink what’s on screen. Decoding the thin strands that connect stories to each other is a journey better embarked upon by those watching it for a second or third time… Visually, there’s no doubting Cloud Atlas’ power to arrest; this is one of those movies that deserves to be seen on a big screen (and, thankfully, there’s no 3-D involved). The most eye-popping sequences occur during the 22nd century story, where comparisons to Blade Runner, The Fifth Element, and the Star Wars prequels will be made , but the effects work is no less effective (although not as ostentatious) during the other episodes… Of all the actors, Hanks gets to have the most fun, playing a profanity-spewing thug out of a Guy Ritchie movie, a sleazy doctor, a self-serving hotel receptionist, a whistleblower, an exaggerated Jim Broadbent, and a futuristic tribesman. Hugo Weaving, who memorably played Agent Smith in The Matrix, appears in all six stories in full villain mode. The poor guy doesn’t even get one opportunity to play a sympathetic character, instead essaying (among others) a ruthless hitman, a Nurse Ratched type, and a demonic entity… If anything, Cloud Atlas’ allowing actors to cross racial lines can be seen as an emphasis of the universality of the human experience rather than a repudiation of it… Some viewers will no doubt believe they have experienced something more transcendent than what’s actually on screen, and who am I to dispute them? However, taken as little more than six disconnected shorts featuring the same group of players in different roles, Cloud Atlas works. It’s entertaining and the manner in which it has been edited reduces one’s tendency to lose patience with the less engaging stories. It’s not an Oscar contender and probably won’t break any box office records but, as one of the most expensive indie productions ever assembled, it has accomplished many things – not the least of which is translating an ‘unfilmable’ novel into a motion picture that is both coherent and able to retain the soul of its source material.”

Frank Howley/Tumblr: “Because of its colossal ambition, the film took a while to grow on me, but once I was able to connect its sprawling plots it really struck and surprised me by being intensely life-affirming. I’m still elated as I write about it, the film put me in such a positive mood of reflection and ultimately its beautiful message of humanity made me cry… Once I was able to grasp where each story was headed, I let everything blend together and it became incredibly impressive to watch. Some stories connected better than others, but the editing and presentation is fully awe-inspiring. Everything cuts so fast together and moves along quickly, so that even weaker segments don’t bog the film down… Cloud Atlas is one of most ridiculously ambitious films of its time and still manages to succeed. Mostly funded from foreign investors outside of the Hollywood system, it’s a bold new move in the world of transnational cinema. Please see Cloud Atlas in theaters if you can. By showing up and supporting the film, you’re making an important vote that you want to see bold and inventive cinema.  ”

Period Piece: “Ambitious. Thought provoking. Expertly crafted. Cloud Atlas is a film which for the casual viewer will provide entertainment, for the cinephile perhaps obsession… In our world we are inundated with films which are content to neither make us feel nor make us think, and only ever to do either one under the canopy of their ideologies. This is a film which peels back the layers of the sky, where the Earth is a blue shimmer which we may perceive as we wish, and we are free to both think and feel profoundly. Our heroes are people, human in both their frailty and the immense conviction of their love. For their lives to have significance, they must impart something to others, often with a confidence that defies their immediate circumstances… There is little to be said about the cast which has not been said before as most are legends or little short of, only that they are capable of underlining the poignancy in each others’ performances despite being separated by vast oceans of time and circumstance. Ben Whishaw and James D’Arcy create an intricate, heartbreaking tale told in stares across such oceans… This is one of those films which will be referenced by mainstream media for two weeks or so and then quietly fade away, like the notes of an adagio under the crashes and bangs of whatever cymbal (most likely Skyfall) happens to be struck next. I guarantee you it will not fade so quickly from your memory. It is a film that you will be glad to have seen, even at a rather prodigious running time of 2 hours and 45 minutes.”

Ron Hogan, Den of Geek: “Cloud Atlas is a visually stunning work of art. The movie’s multiple settings are all wonderfully rendered, and each is instantly recognizable after only a few frames. You can tell the Wachowskis are involved at several points, particularly in the special effects-heavy Neo Seoul. It’s very stylish and they build an effective, interesting world. In fact, all of the movie’s settings feel epic, and are shot accordingly. Even 70s era San Francisco feels epic, in spite of the grime. This is an absolutely gorgeous movie…. Perhaps more impressive than even the scenery is the makeup. Using the same cast members for a multitude of roles is always a dicey proposition, but the makeup is what sells it….  The acting choices are also skillful. This is an all-star cast in every sense of the word. While some choices, and some of Tom Hanks’ accents, don’t work, that’s to be expected when you play six different roles in a movie, alternating three or four of them within a week of shooting. Hugo Weaving plays a great devil in Old Georgie, Hugh Grant plays an excellent sleazy businessman, Hanks is never not good, and James D’Arcy has what might be the toughest role in playing the young and old versions of Rufus Sixsmith. Still, in a cast full of brilliant performers and performances, the real stand-out is Doona Bae, who ties the whole thing together as the replicant Soonmi 451. She’s the face of this film, and she provides the performance that drives the movie’s ultimate point home… While it all ties together beautifully at the end, it can be a difficult journey to undertake. It’s wonderful, and the weaker segments are easily supported by the superior segments (the literary agent, Neo Seoul)….  However, for all its flaws, Cloud Atlas is still a brave attempt and a successful adaptation of the impossible novel. It’s long, and it can be difficult, but it’s worthwhile. The acting is brilliant, the team of the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer acquit themselves very well, and the editing is deft. It should not be nearly as successful as it is, and that’s a credit to the drive and desire of the filmmakers. If you have the nearly three hours to spare, give Cloud Atlas a chance. It may never make complete sense if you try to connect the parts together, but what about life makes sense? It’s an experience. Enjoy it.”

K. Dale Koontz, Unfettered Brilliance: “I have to say, I’ve never seen anything like this movie. Ever. I think it’s absolutely brilliant and let me explain why… All too often today, films lack ambition. Worse, they don’t trust the audience to figure anything out, so the storytelling tends to be ‘tell,’ rather than ‘show.’ Cloud Atlas trusts you to be able to connect the dots (by the way, a ‘cloud atlas’ is a real thing) and expects you to try….  There’s certainly some Carl Jung in here – I caught myself mulling over the concept of archetypes and the collective unconscious after the credits ran. And Joseph Campbell would swoon over this film.  Swoon….Some will balk at the length. Some will balk at the pidgin language used in one part. Some will balk at the mixing of time periods….I think all of these people are missing the point…Oh, and about the pidgin language part. I’ve read some criticism that griped that this part should come with subtitles. Really, buddy? Stop taking snarky notes on your popcorn bucket and try concentrating. (I know – that was snarky. Trust me, it was deserved.)…To sum up, Cloud Atlas is a movie for viewers who are willing to settle in for a long ride, who aren’t afraid to think and who can still marvel at the way a movie can touch us emotionally.”

Cloud Atlas Post-Release Review Roundup Part 2

Note: this is an archived entry. Some links might not still work, but I have tried to ensure scan and video embeds are still in place. If any linked material is unavailable, please let me know and I’ll attempt to find a copy in my personal archives.

[I hope the rest will fit here… Again. I’ll try to add photos, etc later today if I still have power. But I wanted to get this massive sampling of reviews up before I lose it.]

Dave White, Movies.com: “With three creators working to seamlessly tell multiple stories and interpret the novel by David Mitchell in a way that makes cinematic rather than literary sense, pinning down a single precise meaning or motivation is a game you could play all day.And reading the entire film as Lana Wachowski’s transgender coming out statement is too reductive. It’s in there, of course, and not just the parts where Hugo Weaving plays the meanest female nursing home employee in the world. But that’s not all there is. There’s a lot of everything… The filmmakers have bitten off way more than even three people can chew and that unwieldy quality is also what pushes it toward exhilaration. It’s silly and tonally jarring, but silly can be endearing. It’s also moving, something sci-fi doesn’t often accomplish… Walk out after twenty minutes and you’ll shortchange yourself, missing the complete experience of a movie taking a big goofy dare. Just stay put and show some respect for its enormous, ridiculous, mystical balls. They’re huge.”

Robert Denerstein, Denerstein Unleashed: “Directed by Lana Wachowski, Andy Wachowski and Tom Tykwer, the movie probably shouldn’t work at all. It alternates (not always elegantly) between six stories in six different genres, involves actors playing multiple roles, tests the limits of make-up artistry and tries to wrap things up with a cosmic bang that makes room for a string of woozy ideas about reincarnation, the connectedness of all life, the elasticity of boundaries and more…. You can tell that the two Wachowskis and Tykwer are after something big, but Cloud Atlas seems to work best in small doses, as its many stories unfold…

You also can express gratitude to the movie gods that Halle Berry, in a variety of roles, seems to have subdued her instincts for overdoing things. I’m sure I’m forgetting someone, but the rest of the cast includes Susan Sarandon, James D’Arcy, Ben Whishaw, David Keith and many more actors of varying pay grades…Credit Weaving for outdoing Louise Fletcher in a Nurse Ratched-like role, part of the segment in which Broadbent’s publisher character is confined to an asylum… But there’s no denying the Wachowskis and Tykwer also whip up some magical images. If nothing else, the movie tends toward visual opulence, some of it expressed with wit.”

 

Trevor Link, Spectrum Culture: “Its message is simple, like a nugget of raw knowledge, but the extrapolations one may make from it are endless, and it embodies a preternatural resistance to cynicism. The performances belong to another era as well, exhibiting a pre-modernist, rather populist theatricality, suited to the film’s deeply committed romanticism, which wafts with a pleasantly old-fashioned air. Tom Hanks, one of the few Hollywood actors who can pull off this manner of utterly unpretentious showmanship, is the perfect avatar for a film that so nakedly wears its heart on its sleeve. Most daring of all, some of the cast play characters who differ in race and gender from their own, a potential obstacle for those who fail to see the filmmakers’ intent. In short, Cloud Atlas is not fashionable, but it is quite remarkable, a deeply personal independent film, made with a budget of over $100 million and the explicit intent to make a true work of art by a group of filmmakers that includes the most visible transgender director to ever make a feature film. It’s astounding that this film even exists… Cloud Atlas pivots between centuries with such agility that slivers of experience, separated by generations, criss-cross one another rapidly and spontaneously, a free play of temporal events highlighting unforeseen interconnections and generating new, multiplicative meanings at an exponential pace… The effect[of the editing and narrative cross-cutting] is thrilling and new, something perhaps never witnessed ever before in cinema on this scale, and despite the film’s significant dept to its literary origins, this is a decidedly cinematic effect: it is because we identify these individuals with their actors’ bodies first and foremost—this is true even when the characters are under makeup and prosthetics, as they frequently are—that we draw links between these characters that function quite differently than anything literature can achieve… The relationship between the varied characters each actor plays is never made clear—is it a kind of reincarnation or merely some form of synchronicity like the butterfly effect?—but Cloud Atlas is greater for leaving these interconnections mysterious, more poetic than explanatory… That all of these are equal suggests not that all actions or fates are the same but that each movement towards the humanistic ideal embodied by the film is momentous in and of itself, in whatever form it takes. Like any parable, Cloud Atlas’ core is shockingly simple, but the depth of the ethical world it constructs, connecting actions separated by decades and centuries, is nothing short of ennobling in its massive scope.”

Charlie Jane Anders, io9: “Fittingly, how you wind up feeling about Cloud Atlas depends very much on your vantage point: the individual pieces, when you pull them out separately, are sometimes quite dismal. But when you pull back and look at the movie as a whole, it’s dazzling, and ultimately pretty satisfying. It’s just one more layer of meta in a film that’s jammed full of meta: the film’s deeply flawed greatness is an extension of its themes of the whole being more than the sum of its parts. And the world being the sum of good and bad choices. In any case, this is one film you should see for yourself…With any film, there are two versions: the version you watch at the time, and the version that reconstitutes itself in your mind the next day when you’re in the shower. We tend to judge films based on the latter, hot-shower version. Sometimes it takes a few days after you see a film for an overall verdict to crystallize in your mind, with all the pieces falling into place. But Cloud Atlas seems to be a special case: I saw it days ago, and it’s still refusing to come into focus, although I feel as though I mostly liked it a lot…   I haven’t even mentioned how stylish a lot of it is. Even while you’re gawping at the weird makeup, you’re also gasping at some terrific production design and a lot of beautifully filmed action. Viewed purely as an action movie, or as a set of stories about characters who are on different journeys, Cloud Atlas is a great thrillride. And it earns a lot of goodwill for having a powerful ending, that actually makes all of its messages about the individual and society feel profound rather than trite. I walked out of this film feeling as though I’d seen a great film that included some ultra-questionable decisions, and I still feel that way…Here’s the best way to describe Cloud Atlas that I’ve come up with: it’s like one of those gourmet meals that includes really pungent French cheese and fresh goat brains and stuff. But if you can deal with some really wrong flavors, the aftertaste might actually leave you really super happy that you ate the whole thing.”

Jasper Zweibel, PolicyMic: “Cancel your plans for tonight, and go see Cloud Atlas. I’m serious. The Wachowskis (formerly brothers), have achieved absolute success in what was by far the most ambitious film I have ever seen. There are so many reasons why this movie should have been a disaster: the sprawling plot, the enormous demands on the actors and art directors, the oft intense melodrama, and the sheer length of it to boot. But it all worked. Not one of the 164 minutes of Cloud Atlas was anything less than supremely entertaining… Within each story there is action, comedy, and drama, all of which are executed to perfection. I laughed, I cried, and I was on the edge of my seat. All those cliches and more were true of me as I rode the Cloud Atlas roller-coaster. Admittedly, some of the melodrama drew chuckles from one or two audience members, but not from me. I was sold 100% throughout the film… As for the acting, it is phenomenal across the board. Cloud Atlas has a true ensemble cast, so while Tom Hanks and Halle Berry get top billing, they are no more integral to the success of the film than anyone else. Hugo Weaving, Doona Bee, Jim Sturgess, and Ben Whishaw are all sensational, and Jim Broadbent is downright hilarious in his primary role as Timothy Cavendish…  Changing an actors age convincingly is challenge enough, and gender is even tougher, but never has a film attempted to so boldly change the race of its actors. I honestly don’t know how they pulled it off, but they did, and the result is magical… There is simply no way to take in all of Lana and Andy Wachowski’s masterful filmmaking in one sitting. I cannot wait to see it again, and you shouldn’t wait to see it once. A+”

Wired has three different critics take on the film’s different components (acting, script, symbolism, etc) and all three rate it 7 or 8 out of 10; Since their format is unique and difficult to excerpt, head over to their website.

Ryan McNeil, The Matinee: “A funny thing happened on the way to writing this review; I discussed the film at length on a podcast. There, my friend Kurt bemoaned the fact that many of the lessons CLOUD ATLAS wants to teach are lessons we’ve learned all these lessons by now. I said it then, and I’ll say it now: I don’t think we have learned these lessons after all. I don’t think the whole world knows that big companies aren’t interested in protecting their employees. I don’t think the whole world knows that the ruthless will always feed on the week. And I don’t think that everyone has yet learned that their reputation is firmly in the hands of those too willing to destroy it…. I think that many either haven’t learned these lessons yet – or have conveniently forgotten them – and that’s how we find ourselves where we are. We find ourselves in that place where, to paraphrase Louisa, we make the same mistakes over and over again…  To help us understand why, CLOUD ATLAS paints on a massive canvas. It brings together its six narratives in a way that is both disjointed and yet strangely complimentary. It’s as if we are spending a restless night drifting in and out of dreams and nightmares, and we have lost sense of what is a dream and what is reality. That audacity in its storytelling leads CLOUD ATLAS to lose us for a little while towards the end of the second act. However, right around the moment when we are ready to throw up our hands in surrender, the story finds us. It takes us by the hand, and guides us the rest of the way home… Yes, we might very well find ourselves playing a part we’ve heard before. However, even though the song remains the same, it’s a song of hope…and one that we must continue to play until every last note is heard and understood.” (4 out of 4 stars)

Harry Knowles, Ain’t It Cool News: “The film, for me, dove into a realm of spirituality and soul that is non-denominational, but felt right.   A lot of couples that get married talk about that moment in which their eyes first locked.  It’s a powerful moment – even now in my memory – the greatest thing I’ve ever seen were the eyes of the woman I married.   And I knew it almost instantly.   It changed me fairly radically.   But that first moment, that electrical connection – that memory – the feeling it hits me with.   That’s explored in this film.  You find that there are people you don’t like and yet you don’t know why – you just don’t like them & worse their very existence seems to be there to drive you insane.   Why do things happen to us?  Why are there so many coincidences.   WHY is it the way it is?…CLOUD ATLAS explores the possibilities.   Explores them with three amazing filmmaking talents directing.   Tom Tykwer, Andy & Lana Wachowski.   They’ve made a mesmerizing film that as I’ve described thus far may seem like an impenetrable mess of juxtaposed existences manipulated by filmmakers to create the exact feelings that I’m going off on, but it isn’t a mess.   It isn’t impenetrable.   It isn’t boring or cold.   It isn’t being stuffed down your throat…. People use the term mind-blowing – this is what they’re talking about….Run to this.   You claim you’re tired of the same fucking shit every time you go to a theater.   Well go to this.   Then realize you’re going to buy the score – and you’re going to sit at you computer as you listen to it and tearfully explain to this dear friend, lover or associate why you must see this film with them.   This film is to be experienced with the people in life whom you enjoy your favorite conversations.   The conversations that you take to heart and that mean the world to you at 5 am on a long night.   See this with someone you love to experience new things with.   Someone that if you look at them in the movie, they’re looking at you at the exact moment you look at them with the same, “HOLY SHIT” look blazed upon their faces.This is the best thing opening today, by leaps and bounds! “

Eric Samdahl, Film Jabber: “Four years after the disaster that was Speed Racer, the Wachowskis have redeemed themselves, as Cloud Atlas is one of the better movies of 2012….Also co-directed by Tom Tykwer, Cloud Atlas is an elaborate, beautiful film that mesmerizes from start to finish. Despite featuring a complex array of stories and characters, the movie is not a mind bender. Early on, one of the characters narrates to the audience, in more eloquent words, ‘to be patient as everything will make sense soon enough.’ It does… Hanks is terrific, even when he’s hamming it up as a big city criminal with anger issues. Jim Broadbent is great as usual. Doona Bae, who plays the film’s most critical role, is stellar. Jim Sturgess, Ben Whishaw, Keith David and James D’Arcy also turn in fine performances. Susan Sarandon is good in a limited role, and Hugh Grant is simply fun to watch (his most memorable role is as a quintessential Hugh Grant character: a jungle cannibal). I’ll even give compliments to Halle Berry, who delivers her first good performance since 2001’s Monster Ball…Some stories and characters work better than others, which is understandable given there are approximately 273 combinations… Hugo Weaving is largely wasted, reduced to forgettable villain roles… But in the scheme of a sweeping three-hour film, those issues are minor. The Wachowskis and Tykwer have pulled off what some apparently would consider the impossible, and it’s a pretty stunning result.”

Travis Keune, We Are Movie Geeks: “THE MATRIX trilogy may be their most recognizable work, but I would contend that CLOUD ATLAS is Andy and Lana Wachowski‘s most profound, accomplished film to date…  CLOUD ATLAS features a line-up of talented stars rarely seen in one film. Leading the cast are Tom Hanks and Halle Berry , whose roles form the primary storyline throughout time, but are not the sole focal point of the film. Hugh Grant delivers performances far outside his normal wheelhouse, delivering some truly unlikeable characters in addition to the enjoyably villainous characters delivered by Hugo Weaving. Weaving, who you may remember as the relentless Agent Smith from THE MATRIX, is much more accustomed to these roles, but seeing Hugh Grant take on this new type of role is refreshing, especially given how well he adapts… CLOUD ATLAS is immeasurably satisfying and uplifting, although few are likely to leave the theater having fully understood the massive scope of this enigmatic cinematic puzzle… CLOUD ATLAS can be an intimidating film to take on, but only on the surface. Once engaged, the film flows surprisingly well, leaping in time from one life to another, setting the viewer up to discover one connection after the other. The whole of the film is tied together by a number of things, one being the actors playing multiple roles…The other significant element that serves as the most intoxicating adhesive is the original score from Reinhold Heil, Johnny Klimek and especially Tom Tykwer for his Cloud Atlas title piece of classically-inspired music…. The viewer’s eyes and ears will relish the feast that is CLOUD ATLAS and what the viewer witnesses is likely to stay with them indefinitely, resonating with an endless amount of food for thought as connections continually get made beyond the initial viewing.” (4.5 out of 5 stars)

Volkmar Richter, The Vancouver Observer: “This is one of the most intellectually expansive films ever made for a mass audience and that may be a handicap. While it’s smart and almost academic and gets your brain working, it doesn’t  as much engage your emotions. You marvel (for almost three hours) at the grand achievement and the sheer size and complexity. You work at it like a puzzle trying to discern how the pieces go together and what they all mean… Ultimately they’re all linked by something that carries on, possibly the soul, more likely ideas. They transfer from one time to the next. There’s always somebody who’s inspired to fight for freedom. Conversely, there’s always the need to fight for it. The film gets all that across in scenes that aren’t always consistent but are beautifully designed. Transitions are often clever.” (3.5 out of 5 Stars)

Philebrity: “Somehow, with all the thematic and tone changes (Jim Broadbent‘s main story is a flat-out comedy, while Doona Bae‘s is a futuristic action-thriller that has the Wachowski stamp all over it), everything still seems to fit together pretty nicely. Perhaps that is due to the near-constant hopping across narrative lines, the general aesthetic, or the over-arching themes that run through everything. It is visually stunning, the score is fantastic, and the acting is … well … mostly-good… The whole thing is an exercise in film-watching stamina (at over 160 minutes). It’s really a marvel if you allow it to be, and for that to happen, you may have to forgive some surface issues for the sake of depth of content. But it’s worth it.”

Edward Davidson, The MacGuffin: “Featuring a cast of well-known actors playing multiple roles in six different time periods, layered under often clever make-up effects, the film is both big and intimate. For the most part it works. It might not be quite as emotionally moving as it aspires to be, but decoding the various story threads gives the audience the pleasure of filling in some of edges of the plots… What works best is the shorthand that the film is able to use throughout. For instance, when showing a future where ‘fabricants’ are manufactured as servants to service consumers they regard as holy, it’s fun for the audience to fill in the gaps in that story. You can quickly extrapolate how our society would reach a place like that. All of the story threads seem to work in this way, where we jump right into the worlds of these characters without much explanation. We don’t always need it… The gimmick of actors in multiple roles is fun. Hugo Weaving as a shamanistic kind of boogeyman in the future while also playing a female Nurse-Ratched-type character in the present as well as various other bad guys throughout is wonderful to watch. Hugh Grant appearing as a ’70s era businessman, a devilish senior citizen in the present, and a loin-clothed bloodthirsty cannibal in the future is particularly effective. The whole game of spot-the-actor that runs throughout is a clever hook. But it also reinforces the themes of interconnectedness that ties all of these tales together… There are some nitpicks. The pigeon-English slang that Hanks and Berry use in the farthest future story is sure to be eventually mocked by comedians… And while everyone will probably debate this movie endlessly, and while it does have some interestingly poignant statements to make about humanity, in the end the film may not be quite as deep as it wishes it is. Yes, love, freedom, and bravery are universally great. But I think we kind of already knew that… But the actors are having a fabulously watchable good time. Despite all the big-name talent on display, the heart of Cloud Atlas belongs to Doona Bae as the fabricant newly realizing she has a larger role to play in the world. She makes a real impression. Also, Broadbent in the senior citizen home is the most comically charming of the bunch. In fact, as high a concept and as big a production as this is, the whole affair has a large bit of theatricality to it. Since the stories are all cut up and presented out of order, you are left with a lot of individual two-person scenes that are quite compelling.”

Mic LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: “There is something new going on in 21st century movies, a strain of films attempting to convey the entire experience of life in a single movie. Alejandro Inárritu has tried this, with lesser (“Babel”) and greater (“Biutiful”) success, and so has Terrence Malick (“The Tree of Life”). “Cloud Atlas,” more successful than most, is the biggest effort yet in this new vein – enormous in length and scope, a film whose purpose doesn’t even begin to come into focus until two hours in… “Cloud Atlas” attempts to depict endless cycles of recurrence, the moral patterns of human existence….If that sounds ambitious and challenging, it is. The filmmakers are betting on audiences being both willing to pay close attention, as underlying connections emerge, and willing to go along for a ride, without a clue as to the destination. The filmmakers are gambling, in fact, on the intelligence and patience of the sci-fi action audience. Let’s wish them luck… Still, despite some weaknesses, a sense gradually emerges in this film- not just an idea, but a strong feeling mixed with an idea – about the dance of good and evil over time. It’s a grown-up person’s vision: When you’re young, it’s possible to believe that evil can be vanquished. As you get older, you realize that evil never stops changing shapes and faces. In ‘Cloud Atlas,’ the monster can be beaten, but always comes back, but always can be beaten. There can never be a happy ending, but there can be a mature consolation that, in itself, has grandeur and is the opposite of despair…I hope ‘Cloud Atlas’ finds its audience.”

Karl Pfeifffer: “It would be wrong to say that this film is about karma or reincarnation. Those are labels, attached by cultures and adopted by societies, and so carry with them connotations and likely inaccuracies. Cloud Atlas seeks to transcend these instances, these windows of the world that we’re used to looking through in our daily lives (indeed, it’s our only view), and study something broader, if not greater… Though at times some of the voice overs and thematic lines feel forced and even obviously trite, I think that’s the risk of a movie trying to do such grand thematic play. And it’s forgivable so long as the depth backs it up. The audience after all are all watching at different levels. And sometimes just pointing out that these character’s souls stretch through the movie, while overt to some, might bring the pieces together for others….The visual components were fantastic. The acting was fantastic. The desire by Lana, Andy, and Tom Tykwer to make this book into a movie permeated the film, and to know that they did it independently, is even more of an accomplishment. Movies that take this kind of risk need to be supported. Hollywood needs to take these kinds of epic risks more often. Because we absolutely need brilliance of this measure on our screens… The actors have the challenge of playing characters of all races and genders. Asians play white characters, male plays female, white as Asian and all back again. This is the necessity demanded of this script. If you want to call it yellowface, you’ve utterly missed the point. That said, it’s not always elegant…Cloud Atlas is a massive scope of a story, and for these three to fit it in one three-hour movie experience, and as elegantly as they did, a true masterwork was accomplished here. And if you’re not left moved by the end of the movie, I hope you’re moved to think about the other impossibilities that this film has now made realistic. A ”

Flame Magazine: “Every once in a while a film comes along that changes your perception of what a motion picture can be, and makes you stop in awe and wonder.’Cloud Atlas’ is that film…. Each character’s journey is somehow a part of the other. Each character’s soul is inexplicably connected to each other throughout time. “Cloud Atlas” is a rich tapestry, so visually stunning and breathtaking. You’re drawn into this universe, more like a celebration of the human spirit, on so many levels. It’s a thriller, it’s a comedy of errors, it’s a love story, and it’s a sci-fi epic. Each actor plays at least three or more characters in any given story or scenario. Even here, the boundaries are bent… I would be surprised if there weren’t any Oscar® nominations in their future. In some cases the transformations are so subtle, you aren’t even aware of them. As the credits are presented at the end of the film and you get to see just who was who, you will be pleasantly surprised. It’s amazing to see just how talented these actors are as they embrace so many different roles.”

Anubhav DasGhupta, Bombay Nerds: “Cloud Atlas is by no means a crappy film. It’s a great one, with some great performances, brilliant cinematography, sublime makeup work, astounding visual effects, but I can see why people may hate it…. Firstly, it’s anything but conventional. You’ve got actors playing multiple roles across different time periods; women play males, males play women, white actors play asians and asians play white people. Then there’s six storylines, and the film tends to jump haphazardly from one story to another. The film gives you no time to breathe, or to go and take a leak. It demands your constant attention. Miss a single beat and you’re screwed. The weird, mumbly dialect in one of the stories doesn’t help either…Cloud Atlas cannot be reviewed. To write a review that’ll decide if people should go spend their money on it or not is an act of sin. Don’t look at the Rottentomatoes ratings, or the ridiculous yellowface accusations. Go and fucking watch this film.” [CJ– You tell ’em!]

Mark Jackson, The Epoch Times: “Cloud Atlas is a majestic tapestry depicting the interwoven skeins of human lifetimes; all the actors reappear in all the scenes. We normally can’t see dead people, but that doesn’t mean they’re not like threads disappearing below the tapestry’s surface and resurfacing elsewhere…. Across the board, this film is packed with sumptuous visual riches. It’s beautifully shot, lit, costumed, directed, and acted…. With the six quickly shifting and flipping storylines, multiple actors reincarnating in multiple roles and lifetimes, makeup that sometimes renders them unrecognizable, and various and occasionally unintelligible accents and patois, it gets a bit hectic. Add to that lots of action in the form of fast-moving futuristic gunships and explosions, slave horse-whippings, replicant euthanasia, and a fair amount of tribal bloodletting—it takes a keen intellect to sort it all out.”

David Chase, Beyond the Marquee: “Let me just say that no review will ever do this film the justice, this is a cinematic movie that MUST be watched, experienced and digested. Yes the film is close to 3 hours long, yes, there are many characters and several plot-lines, and yes you’d better pee and get your popcorn before it starts because you will not want to miss a single minute of it… Whereas in some movies an actor is made-up into a role with heavy prosthetics or wardrobe, Cloud Atlas goes to the extreme and pushes, breaks and creates new boundaries for it’s cast… Men become women, women become men, the young are aged and the aged are made into women…and it’s easy to accept. Yeah the make-up at times seems a little over-the-top, almost too defined, but then others are so well concealed that you’re scanning the credits at the end going ‘That’s who that was!?!’ One thing is for sure, the make-up is a true contender for an Academy Award and it’s evident the actors had a fun time in these varied and dynamic roles!.. I say this is an epic movie because the story-telling is big, though at times you really need to pay attention to details, and other times details are just glossed over, but the scope of the stories within the big picture are engrossing enough, but then to watch it all un-fold to see how it all connects in the end is what really is impressive.”

Jeremy Kirk, FirstShowing,net: “It’ll be difficult not to dip into hyperbole, but that’s what you get with something as ambitious as Cloud Atlas, a film that easily leads the year as most daring and bar none the most satisfying movie experience. The Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer have reached into a novel best described as inscrutable – Some would aptly call it cloudy – and pulled out a visual feast every bit as much for the brain as it is the eyes. Cloud Atlas is the kind of film you need a break from, or its grand themes and colossal structure might overwhelm. But the rewards in experiencing and reflecting on it are precisely why we love films…. The characters we meet in these settings and their stories unfold quickly, Andy & Lana Wachowski and Tom Tykwer keeping the film’s momentum always on the go. At first, Cloud Atlas feels like a deluge, your mind working overtime to keep up with who or where or what we’re seeing. The uninitiated might throw their hands up in frustration when Doona Bae’s Sonmi-451 appears, throwing what’s previously been a period piece into the stylishly computerized world of tomorrow. But the Wachowskis and Tykwer understand their audience needs establishment, and their fast-paced introduction to these six stories right at the top of the film is a required foothold needed to let yourself sink into the overall story… Each of the stories work on their own, but they also fit into the grand scope of what could only be referred to as the design of the world perfectly. Bits of information learned in one has a hand in the events shown in another, and every action by every character ends up having a purpose, almost a guide for Event A and how it leads to Event Z. Forget the Butterfly Effect. That’s a ripple in a pond compared to the grand-scale ideas at work here… Nearly every actor in the film plays multiple roles, some switching up age, race, or even gender between parts… However, the intricate way in which every detail of this film is handled keeps the wheels on the track, and where most inexperienced or mediocre filmmakers might offer up an ugly wreck of a film, the three at work here have given us what could be viewed in years to come as a masterpiece. Hugo Weaving showing up in drag might bring up scattered unintentional laughter, but even that fits in with the story and tone at hand… Each actor takes absolute charge with each of their roles, as well, most of them quite literally disappearing in front of our eyes under heavy makeup..  [E]veryone in Cloud Atlas does a remarkable job, the chameleon aspect of much of their roles only a part of the praise…  Some film makers are just working on a grander scale than others, and while Michael Bay and James Cameron are making mindless or semi-mindless adventures that look like a billion dollars, the Wachowskis and Tykwer are reaching for something with a deeper meaning. Cloud Atlas is another experience from them that brings an audacity and visual extravagance to a beautiful, moving, and audacious story about love and the effects such works of art have for future generations. Cloud Atlas is a film intended to endure, and bravo to the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer for making it such an awesome experience. Jeremy’s Rating: 10 out of 10”

Daniel Pinto, DNA: “The best kind of science fiction film is not necessarily the one which can take you on the most imaginative ride or offer the best-looking vistas, but that which manages to be thought-provoking and sometimes, like any great work of art, a heart-wrenching reflection on the human condition… Even though the viewer is pulled and flung from one world to the next, the flow of the story, action and the suspense is well-regulated. Life, its eternal recurrence, the good and evil in human nature, the vagaries of the cosmos – merely one canvas can seldom do justice of such lofty themes. But at 172 minutes, Cloud Atlas tries to get the job done… [Hugo] Weaving, as he does so well in the Wachowskis’ Matrix trilogy, plays the antagonising forces through history. Embodying the age-old might-is-right mentality, he chews up the scenery from a slave herder to a female nurse (!) to a satanic Dr Hyde-esque vision that haunts the tormented tribesman Zachry, played by Hanks (who himself has an unsavoury past as the poisonous Dr Goose, an avaricious innkeeper and the loose cannon writer who lands editor Timothy Cavendish, played by the brilliant Broadbent, into trouble). Grant is also suitably slimy  essaying the roles of the head of the evil nuclear project, the unforgiving brother and the tattooed scavenger of the future. Berry is just about all right, mostly as the agent of good, sometimes completely hidden under prosthetics- as everyone else- when an extra in somebody else’s story. Whishaw playing the rakish but reflective musician Robert Frobisher, whose life takes a tragic turn in the film’s opening and and D’Arcy as his wistful scientist lover, lends great gravity to the film…Part special effects extravaganza, part morality tale, the massively ambitious Cloud Atlas is more than a worthwhile watch.”

Bruce Handy, Vanity Fair: “Cloud Atlas, which stars Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Jim Broadbent, Susan Sarandon, Hugh Grant, and a bunch of other people, all playing multiple roles with the help of all kinds of age, race, and gender makeup, is one of the single most entertaining movies I have ever seen. It’s also, in an equally ambitious and crazily pulpy way, one of the silliest… I should add that, for me, ‘silly’ isn’t always a pejorative—in politics or business, yes, but not necessarily in entertainment, and certainly not in comedy (Jerry Lewis and Benny Hill notwithstanding). What’s silly about Cloud Atlas is all the crazy, dazzling effort it goes to, all the Mach-5, V-8 filmmaking talent it harnesses, to make some ultimately rather obvious points about evergreens such as love, evil, freedom, art—the highs and lows of human nature, the stuff the species is stuck with, for better or worse, profound or boring…
So please don’t be intimidated by Cloud Atlas, which was written and directed by the Wachowski siblings, Andy and Lena, who previously made the Matrix movies and Speed Racer, and Tom Tykwer, best known for Run Lola Run. Some reviews might make the new film sound like work, but it’s not—it’s fun!.. The film ends on an upbeat, even hokey note, or at least it wants you to think it does. The scenes sell themselves that way amid soaring score and twinkles in Hanks’s and Berry’s eyes, although there’s a grim irony in the ending, too, which I won’t give away and which I’m also not sure the filmmakers are aware of—well, of course they’re aware of it; I mean I’m not sure they see it as grim. Hokey-grim: another interesting fusion. Let’s discuss once you’ve seen the film… Their proximity on the release schedule, and in Oscar speculation, along with their similarly high butt-sit factor, leads me to think of Cloud Atlas as the polar opposite of The Master, in that the former wears a big heart on its sleeve while the latter, at least for me, was frustratingly opaque. But both are bravura feats of filmmaking and, however long, I was sorry to see the credits roll on both. I will pay Cloud Atlas what I think of as the ultimate compliment: I will eagerly seek out the four- or five-hour director’s-cut version, which I’m sure exists, when it arrives on DVD or shows up at Film Forum.”

[CJ: Re the film’s ending: yeah, I initially wondered the same thing, but after a second viewing, I’m more certain the filmmakers knew exactly what they were doing, and meant the superficially happy ending to have a bitter sting. I’ve often accused the Wachowskis of having an overly romantic view of the world… some comments about 2001 (one of my favorite films and theirs) at the October 6 preview screening made me think perhaps they saw only Arthur C Clarke’s “cosmic optimism” in the film, but not enough Kubrickian darkness. I even mentioned to my boyfriend that any notion 2001 is purely about the hope for human evolution or progress should be balanced by observing what the first proto-hominids in the film do the moment the symbolic black slab shows up: use their newly discovered “tools” to brain other animals, then one another. But then I noticed a subtle but direct homage to 2001 during my second viewing of Cloud Atlas: during the scene where Autua is being whipped, he’s lashed to a very black-slab-like totem, and his fellow villagers are intoning an ominous hum that sounds exactly like the one heard in 2001.

In both the novel and film versions of Cloud Atlas, the earth is in a perilous state at the end, and only a small remnant of humanity persists. Zachry has survived to old age and is telling youngsters (presumably his grandchildren) his story. His vantage point is somewhat different in the film, but in either case, he’s been forced to abandon his village and has lost much of his family and tribe. I personally found the film version cornier on the surface, but sadder beneath.  The Wachowskis based the entire premise of The Matrix trilogy on the notion that humanity had destroyed most of the earth is a blinkered, single-minded quest to destroy the Machines, who were initially only seeking fair treatment. So… I think they know what the ending of their own movie means this time too. On a dark-humored note, the film’s ending also reminded me of George Carlin’s assertion that this planet would one day “shake us off like a bad case of fleas”. Also: Monty Python’s “Galaxy Song”. ] 😉

Dr Know, Bullseye or Misfire: “I have to say everyone on board is top-notch, and even though I was able to pick many of the key players out in their various guises, there were some instances where they also slipped past. I didn’t realize I was watching the same actor in certain roles until the end credits rolled and got me up to speed. Well done… Cloud Atlas is a thriller, a love story, a sci-fi action movie, a coming-of-age story, a Greek tragedy, a murder mystery, a commentary on sexuality and race, and so on and so on and so on…If you truly love cinema as an art form this movie will open up plenty a debate between you and your film-nerd friends. This is a movie that will astound, captivate, enthrall, baffle, sadden and frustrate so many. It defies description and skewers conventions at every turn. No amount of writing I do in this tin space can do it justice (the reason why this review is shorter than usual). There will be some that love it, there will be some that detest it. It all depends on what kind of baggage you bring to an indescribable movie like this.”

Matt Balk, Cinema Snob: “Cloud Atlas is one of the most polarizing movies I’ve seen in a long time, certainly the most polarizing “mainstream” movie made in the US in the last half decade or so.  By “polarizing”, I mean that you will either A) almost certainly be fascinated by this movie, and grow to love it, or B) you will reject its premise by the halfway point and leave the theater demanding your $10 back.  I should let you know up front that personally, I fall into the former group. ..  One of your questions might be, is this a perfect movie? The answer is no. But is it a fascinating movie?  I would argue, yes… There are connections to be made (watch for the comet-shaped birthmark), but the viewer is asked to do a lot of the work; nothing is really spoon-fed for you.  Hell, I’m not even going to pretend I “understood” everything in Cloud Atlas, but I do want to see it again to experience it… The movie also uses this reincarnation concept to make some interesting choices (and potentially controversial ones) regarding race and gender.  Several of the lead characters switch gender and race throughout the movie, to varying effectiveness.  Some people may have a problem with the thought of Hugh Grant or Hugo Weaving playing a person of Asian decent (complete with makeup), while others might find it hard to see Halle Barry playing a Jewish-european or Ben Whishaw as a woman.  Most of the time the makeup works; most of the time.  And most of the actors are up to the task of playing multiple roles.  Is it offensive, to see white actors playing those of Asian descent, and vice-versa?  Normally I would say yes, but because the characters are not playing it up for laughs, and instead are (what I interpret as) representing souls, I did not find it problematic… [D]espite its flaws, I enjoyed the hell out of watching this movie, and really want to see it again. My Grade:  A-”

Mark Dujsik, Mark Reviews Movies: “Cloud Atlas is enormously ambitious in scope, bizarrely experimental in execution, and equal parts straightforward and confounding in its ideas.  The film imagines itself to be a hopeful fable about the significance of any given individual for the furtherance of humanity’s ideal.  Pragmatically, though, that idealism is overshadowed by the cyclical nature of its six-part narrative.  Here are stories about our tendency to kill, to oppress, and to conquer…. This is dense material, and the film is actually at its strongest when it engages us in hand-holding.  The scientist’s monologue, which arrives at a significant turning point in all six stories, and a climactic speech about the nature of freedom lend the stories an emotional impact that is often lost amidst the constant back-and-forth-and-further-back-and-even-further-forward narrative… It is easy to become disoriented as to the overarching purpose of Cloud Atlas as it offers stories of varying levels of interest and significance.  The film’s technical achievements, though, are substantial enough to forgive the film its shortcomings.”

James Jay Edwards, Film Fracture: “Cloud Atlas requires a bit of a commitment from the viewer. Clocking in at just less than three hours, it is not only long but heavy, deep and complex. It requires attention, and a casual audience may find themselves lost between the expansive ensemble of characters and the extensive time periods involved. But, for those with some patience and an appreciation for beautiful filmmaking, Cloud Atlas is a very rewarding experience… The cast in Cloud Atlas is remarkable. Not only does every performer play multiple roles (most of the big names have parts, albeit small, in all six segments), but the differences in genre and time period test each actors skills to the fullest. For example, Halle Berry plays two African American characters, two Indian characters and one rich Jewish character. Hugo Weaving even plays a Nurse Ratched-esque woman in the convalescent home segment. For many of the roles the actors are caked in makeup and prosthetics as well; Hugh Grant is in all six parts and is only recognizable as himself in the 1970s blacksploitation one. The entire ensemble has a field day, but Tom Hanks really stands out. His roles range from the lead in the post-apocalyptic section to a short cameo in the modern day area, and he is great whenever he is onscreen. Hanks and Berry are even forced to fumble through some seriously questionable dialect in the post-apocalyptic tale, and they not only pull it off, they own it. Even with tons of costuming and makeup hiding their faces and bodies, the experienced cast of Cloud Atlas manages to turn in memorable performances that add to the breathtaking imagery… The best way to describe Cloud Atlas is visually stunning. Every little detail of the filmmaking is meticulous, from the locations and sets to the special effects and makeup…  As different as the filmic choices are, everything still looks like it belongs in the same movie. The directors undertook a huge task with Cloud Atlas, but the end product succeeds admirably at what it sets out to do – it is an amazing, genre-bending example of modern filmmaking.”

Matthew Newlin, California Literary Review: “Watching Cloud Atlas, a magnificently orchestrated work of cinema, is like watching one of your most vivid dreams (the kind that is both ludicrously fantastical and disturbingly real) being projected on an enormous screen in front of you. Like the surreal adventures we have when we go to sleep at night, Cloud Atlas introduces the viewer to worlds they would have otherwise never imagined…  Far from a gimmick of indulgence on the part of the directors, the result of this approach is a sense that the audience has been a part of the story the whole time, just like the characters themselves. The characters (or their souls, more accurately) are experiencing the same struggles, conflicts, happiness and anger again and again and we the audience begin to sense what this seemingly endless cycle may feel like… One of the most vocal criticisms of Cloud Atlas will undoubtedly be the half dozen or so characters played by many of the lead actors. Detractors will likely try to argue that the film becomes a game of ‘spot the actor’ given the heavy makeup and prosthetics used to transform the actors from one incarnation into the next. This wasn’t an oversight on the part of the Wachowskis and Tykwer. The repetition of actors gives even greater depth to the sense of ‘Hey, haven’t I seen you somewhere before?’ that many of the characters experience throughout the film…Fans of the Wachowskis and Tykwer may leave feeling disappointed or deflated due to fact that Cloud Atlas is more about storytelling than spectacle…  While some of the actors are more adept at transformation than others, the performances overall are terrific…  Cloud Atlas is a cinematic experience unlike any other. The Wachowskis and Tykwer have delivered a film more ambitious than any of their other work with themes much more personal than they have, independently, explored before. It is a thrilling journey and an example of how magical cinema can be.”

Martin Lieberman, Martin’s Musings: “The stories aren’t told in chronological order. Rather, we bounce between them at a rapid pace like a pinball, marveling time and again at the parallels…Subtle it’s not: The connectedness theme is illustrated in each vignette by a protagonist who stands up to or fights against a controlling figure, showing the struggle to be free is one we will always face. Some characters in each story have a shooting-star birthmark. And we’re told multiple times that we are all but a drop in the ocean of life, or ‘our lives are not our own,’or ‘death opens another door.’…Most significant to the theme is that the same actors play roles in each vignette — sometimes roles that mix up genders, race, age, and skin color. It’s a total stunt that’s made possible with the help of some talented makeup artists, but it works as a way to illustrate that part of us carries on from one generation to the next… The Wachowskis and Twyker are visual masters, and each of the film’s six segments has its own unique look, feel, and tone… Kudos to the editing team for somehow making it all fit together… I respect the ambition of Cloud Atlas, and I did actually enjoy most of it. So I’m going to give the film a B.”

Tim Grierson, Deadspin: “I’m not a big fan of ensemble, “everything is, like, connected, man” movies, but to my mind Cloud Atlas trumps Crash, Babel, and the like because of how giddy and unbridled it is in its ambition and scope. Where other movies of this kind would ponderously cart out each dramatic irony or narrative echo with the seriousness of a sermon, Cloud Atlas is actually pretty light on its feet. There’s no question the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer are deeply invested in the notion that our lives are intertwined in mysterious, cosmic ways, but they approach that idea utilizing a breezy pop vernacular. Like The Matrix and Run Lola Run, Cloud Atlas takes Weighty Themes and gives them a crowd-pleasing spin… That’s why the movie’s mix of genres is so lively and, at the same time, profound in a playful way…  When you get right down to it, Cloud Atlas is very much about the act of storytelling itself, and while not all the segments work, not one of them plays out in a predictable way—they bounce around with a sense of limitless possibility, as if their tellers are making them up as they go along…  In that spirit, I found the more questionable choices—like having Halle Berry in whiteface or Hugo Weaving made up as a woman—kind of a hoot. You complain that the movie ‘veers most dangerously toward camp’ at these moments, but I think that’s just one more tone in the film, another color on the filmmakers’ palette. For all of its supposed seriousness, Cloud Atlas is actually pretty damn fun… I think this is a pretty dazzling-looking movie. If the stories didn’t work for you, I can imagine this won’t make much of a difference, but Cloud Atlas is quite often simply stunning as a piece of visual storytelling… Cloud Atlas is one of those rare movies whose inconsistencies didn’t bother me that badly because its confident audacity smooths over most of those problems. A few iffy effects shots, silly wigs, and some awkward stabs at comedy don’t derail a movie that’s this brazenly alive and free. It’s easy to let its flaws get to you, but I think it’s far more rewarding if you accept them as part of the rich tapestry of this whole crazy endeavor. I’m glad I did.”

Louie Coruzzollo, Chasing Cinema: “Cloud Atlas presents several, different set periods that are visually stunning. Wether it is in futuristic Korea, or in the post-apocalyptic Hawaii the visuals are wonderful. The filmmakers create a fantastic universe that is unique, beautiful, loving, cold, and bold. Along with the great scenery the special effects are just as astonishing. This easily allows the audience to get lost in their universe, and to be swept away for three hours. Accompanying the visual feast is a magnificent score that sets up the film extremely well. The score is soothing, mysterious, sad, and courageous all in the right places. These two qualities are easily the best part of the film, and makes Cloud Atlas a unique experience in the theaters…Cloud Atlas boasts a great cast, and allows many of the cast members to tackle several different characters…  While this is a very intriguing feat that the group accomplishes; the acting in this movie does not blow you away. Jim Sturgess, Ben Whishaw and James D’Arcy are the ones that stand out, but the rest just blend in together.. The major flaw of Cloud Atlas lies with the construction of the stories. The magnitude of the stories are very strong, and are deserving of their own film. By making the stories connect and interweaving, the stories’ affect on the audience is diminished. ..[Also], a great movie should show us their message, and not tell us through repetitive dialogue… Cloud Atlas is still a unique experience that can be appreciated by some. This is not your average Friday night popcorn flick. This movie will make you think throughout, and expects the audience to be collectively intelligent.”

Alyn Darnay, I Rate Films: “I’m sure this film will find its critics, but for me it’s definitely one of the best films of the year. It has also set the record as the most expensive independently financed feature of all time, at approximately $100 million, and it shows everywhere you look on the screen. I believe that Tykwer and the Wachowskis have created a true work of filmic art, that they dared to take big chances, and have fashioned a true cinematic eye-opening blockbuster of a movie. Its grand style, in both scope and ambition, will challenge you as it entertains you and transports you to other times and places. It’s a true movie going experience not to be missed…A word of caution, walk into this film with an open mind and try not to read or listen to too much about it beforehand. A good deal of the fun of the film is in your discovery of its themes and characters. To miss that, is to miss much of the fun.” (4.5 out of 5 Stars)

Fast Food Flix: “Cloud Atlas is the first film I’ve seen in a long time to leave me urging for an immediate second viewing. That’s saying something about The Wachowski Siblings’ and Tom Tykwer’s latest cinematic (and enigmatic) achievement. It’s an ambitious feat to say the least, and anyone who says otherwise should be escorted to Here Comes the Boom instead. Maybe then audiences can be spoon-fed watered-down themes of courage and determination….  The themes and principles explored in Cloud Atlas are too complex and abundant to be analyzed in this review, but I can assure you you’ll leave the theater pocketing a few quotes to later post on your Facebook status… Notwithstanding, the performances here are all relatively strong as we get to see our favorite stars showing off their chops and acting in multiple roles.. Cloud Atlas is a perfect example of classic cinema; it’s a film that exhibits all of the elements in a production coalescing harmoniously to create a truly unique experience. Come award season, it will get the nod in a variety of departments, most notably for Make-up, Editing, and Best Adapted Screenplay…I don’t know how many people will actually enjoy this cinematic experience; Cloud Atlas definitely elicits a mental workout—but I reckon many people will cherish it as something truly original and unparalleled to anything they’ve ever seen.”